• Home
  • About
    • Summary
    • CHILDREN BACK for Christmas!
  • Munby Reforms
    • Significant Judgments
    • Professional Media
    • Mainstream Media
    • Proposals for Reform
    • Online Petitions
  • ‘Social’ Services
  • Judges for ‘justice’?
    • Say it in Poetry
  • EU PETITION
  • MEDIA
  • Contact

The Pedro Family: five children snatched by Lincoln County Council – without paper work

~ parents gagged after five months of fighting for them

The Pedro Family: five children snatched by Lincoln County Council – without paper work

Category Archives: Petitions Committee

Portuguese Government to analyse cases involving Portuguese children taken by British social services @CEOofHMCTS @MoJGovUK @UKHomeOffice

24 Thursday Nov 2016

Posted by Sabine Kurjo McNeill in Algarve Resident, EU Parliament, Petitions Committee

≈ 1 Comment

16-11-24-algarve-residentFollowing a relentless media campaign to highlight Portuguese ‘victims’ of Britain’s alleged “stolen children scandal”, the government has at last agreed to step in.

Pedro Proença – one of the Portuguese lawyers who travelled to England in a bid to help an ever increasing number of Portuguese families recover children from the enforced care of British social service – has told TVI24 that pro-bono efforts have at last borne fruit.

“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has guaranteed that it will be giving special attention to these cases, evaluating them one by one”, he said.

“If cases of real abuse by the British authorities are detected – processual failings or illegalities by the courts and social services – the Portuguese government will step into alert the British government”.

The news is a red-letter day for so many Portuguese emigrés struggling to recover children removed and even placed for adoption on what they claim were totally spurious circumstances.

Portuguese media ‘woke up’ to this scandal in 2014 when five Portuguese children were taken from parents whose pleas for help at the time fell on deaf ears.

Carla and José Pedro joined a protest taken to the European Parliament in which McKenzie Friend campaigner Sabine McNeill made a passionate speech that has since become a landmark in this agonising struggle.

Since then however many more Portuguese children have ‘disappeared’ into the British care system – and the Pedros are still battling for theirs. Hundreds of immigrants to the UK are in a similar agonising predicament, but in cases involving other nationalities governments have already stepped in.

Nationally, TVI24 has been fighting this issue with its documentaries “Love you Mom”, all of which are freely available online.

The four episodes so far have stressed the fact that “many mothers are told they will never see their children again, if they speak to the press”. Criticism over the (lack of) support given by Portuguese consulate authorities has also been highlighted.

Thus this latest news is what campaigners were aiming for. Said Proença yesterday: “We hope it will result in more children being returned to Portuguese families”.

Natasha Donn – Algarve Resident

PHOTO: the Pedro children, all still in care, with their mother who has vowed never to give up in her battle to get them back.

On the European Dimension of Forced Adoptions [in secret family courts – against the will of the parents]:

  • Human Rights and Family Courts – a report by Christopher Chope MP for the Council of Europe in 2012;
  • Social services in Europe: legislation and practice of the removal of children from their families in Council of Europe member States – a report by Duma member Olga Borzova for the Council of Europe in 2015;
  • Draft Mission Report and Recommendations – a report by the Chair of the EU Petitions Committee after a Fact Finding Visit to London in February 2016. 

The Report makes the following 15 recommendations:

1. Relevant statistics should be collected in order to offer a better overview of the issues related not only to non-consensual adoptions and binational cases but also more generally to family law, enabling comparisons between the EU Member States;

2. National family courts should systematically implement the Vienna Convention of 1963 on Consular Relations and articles 15 and 55 of the Regulation EC n°2201/2003 (Brussels II a) at the earliest stage of the child care proceedings and make sure that embassies or consular representations are informed in a timely manner of cases involving their nationals; specific detailed guidelines should be provided for a more efficient implementation of these provisions;

3. The Committee would like to draw attention to a statement by the European Court of Human Rights in Y v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR 33, [2012] 2 FLR 332, para 134:

“family ties may only be severed in very exceptional circumstances and […] everything must be done to preserve personal relations and, where appropriate, to ‘rebuild’ the family. It is not enough to show that a child could be placed in a more beneficial environment for his upbringing. However, where the maintenance of family ties would harm the child’s health and development, a parent is not entitled under article 8 to insist that such ties be maintained.”

4. The Committee would like to draw attention to the risk of subjective interpretation of the grounds for decisions for adoption without parental consent which could emerge from a repeal of the Human Rights Act of 1998; the ECHR (i.e. the right of children to a fair process and the right to respect for family life) will no longer underpin decision-making in courts or local authorities;

5. More attention and appropriate policies should be dedicated to the prevention of care proceedings through monitoring and early warning procedures and the provision of suitable support to families.

6. The timescale of care proceedings (currently 26 weeks max.) should be considered a minimum in order to allow for the proper handling of each case and to ensure that the parents and /or relatives of the child have been given sufficient time to make proposals (on who could be the carer of the child for instance) or any required changes before the adoption is declared definitive;

7.The authorities should ensure that the quality of the social services does not suffer from the budgetary cuts implied by austerity measures (for instance the increase of files to be handled in average by each social worker can have negative effects in the capacity of a proper assessment of individual cases) and that the decisions on proceedings involving custody should be free of any excessive legal pressure, as well as it should not be affected by any financial interest of private parties, such as adoption agencies;

8. Social workers should be given more training on the specific issue of adoption without parental consent;

9. More comprehensive free legal aid schemes should be supported and enhanced all along the care proceedings with the aim to prevent any sort of discrimination;

10. The national authorities and charities involved in care proceedings should ensure that parents are better informed from the very beginning of the proceedings with adequate support to parents with literacy disabilities, including providing all of them with explanations regarding all the legal procedures that they will face, the decisions which may be taken with regards to the future of the child and the consequences, if any, of these decisions, especially in cases relating to section 20 of the Children Act of 1989;

11. In the case of parents who do not speak English, the provision of all the necessary information on the decisions to be taken and their consequences in their own language, or in a language they understand fully, must be ensured; as a first step towards this goal, the telephone helpline service should be made available in several languages;

12. The authorities involved in care proceedings should ensure that parents who have been victims of domestic violence, either as a child or as an adult, or who were themselves taken into foster care, are in no circumstances automatically considered to be at particular risk of causing future emotional harm to their own children; any kind of re-victimisation should be avoided;

13. Social services should ensure the prior identification of potential foster families of the same cultural origin as the child to be placed in care;

14. Solutions which would enable siblings to stay together should be prioritised; if no such solution is possible, every possible measure should be put in place to avoid the complete separation of siblings;

15. The Committee would like to promote the guidelines drafted by the Commission on “coordination and cooperation in integrated child protection systems” which should be kept in mind at every stage of the care proceedings by all services involved.

Related articles

  • A chief EU Brexit negotiator told us why the deal Britain wants makes no sense
  • Brexit deal could end up in EU’s top court, warns Europe’s most senior judge
  • Theresa May says Britain will be ‘unashamedly pro-business’ after Brexit
  • EUROGROUP HEAD: Brexit talks are going to take ‘a lot longer’ than two years

LOVE YOU MOM – #documentary on Portuguese TV about #ChildSnatching #ForcedAdoptions #SocialServices #ChildSnatchUK @UKHomeOffice @CabinetOfficeUK

27 Thursday Oct 2016

Posted by Sabine Kurjo McNeill in Early Day Motion, EU Parliament, Mainstream Media, Petitions Committee, Police Arrest

≈ Leave a comment

LOVE YOU MOM – The most viewed documentary on private TV channel TVI:

Please note this article published by The Mirror in October 2015:

  • The state-sponsored kidnapping of children is not a dream – it’s Britain in 2015 – Secretive family courts seize 10,000 children a year – and we don’t know how many adoptions are right or fair.

Christopher Booker reports regularly about this human rights scandal in his weekly column in The Telegraph and most recently:

  • The depths of Britain’s ‘worst ever’ child care crisis

MEPs came from Brussels for a Fact-Finding Visit and published recommendations in their Draft Mission Report – as an outcome of our petition to Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent.

In March 2014 the Pedros accompanied me to present the petition and were arrested by Lincoln Police for ‘belonging to the Forced Adoption campaigning group’.

Former MP John Hemming complained about it in Parliament with this Early Day Motion.

Yet September 2016 was the highest number of children removed per month: 1,216.

Related articles
  • The terrifying tale of how Britain’s most secret court imprisoned a grandmother
  • Russia Today Bank Accounts Shut Down in UK

PRAISE to a Lincoln County Councillor: 4 of the Pedro children to return?

20 Thursday Nov 2014

Posted by Sabine Kurjo McNeill in EU Parliament, Imprisonment, Petitions Committee, Police Arrest

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Councillor, County council, Lincolnshire

On 11 November 2014, I mentioned in Brussels how the Pedros were arrested for belonging to a ‘forced adoption’ campaign group:

On 17 November 2014, Carla Pedro Jorge met with her County Councillor at Lincolnshire County Council.  This County Councillor is a Member of the Children & Young People’s Scrutiny Committee.

The meeting went very well, prior to the meeting the County Councillor had already sent an email to the Head of Social Services at Lincolnshire CC as well as speaking to her about Carla’s case.

The County Councillor asked Carla why all 5 of her children were taken when the problem was caused only by her eldest child and there were no problems with the other children.

The  County Councillor is going to try to do everything to help Carla – she is going to send letters to all who have been involved with her case, including the legal team at Lincolnshire CC.

The County Councillor is going to have an urgent meeting about Carla’s children’s case with the case Social Workers, their manager, the legal team and the Head of Social Services.

In the opinion of the County Councillor, Carla’s eldest son should stay in care until he calms down and she will do everything to get her 4 other children returned to Carla.  She said that what Social Services have done is completely barbaric as the only child that they needed to be removed was Carla’s eldest as his behaviour is not at all good.

The County Councillor said she will talk with Social Worker Rosemary Stanton because of the allegation that she made against Carla and her ex-husband, Jose, which led to their arrests; she is going to ask why Carla has not seen her 2 youngest children for three months.

The County Councillor said that she is going to do all in her power to get Lincolnshire County Council to reach an agreement with Carla to get the children back home under a Supervision Order.

The County Councillor said that what has been done is against the law and that she is going to help her wherever possible. Carla showed her the screen shots that she has as proof.  The County Councillor told Carla not to worry and that she will probably be contacted about the joint meeting.  The County Councillor is going to keep in touch with Carla.

Meanwhile, the father lost his job – again – due to the interference by Lincolnshire arms reaching all the way to London…

THREE FORCED ADOPTION articles in the National Portuguese Newspaper Publico

10 Tuesday Jun 2014

Posted by Sabine Kurjo McNeill in EU Parliament, Mainstream Media, Petitions Committee, Publico

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Brussel, Brussels, Court of Justice of the European Union, European Commission, European Parliament, Government, Pedro, Petitions Committee, Portugal

14 06 09 PublicoAna Dias Cordeira is the journalist who wrote the most diligent and detailed articles about the Pedros at the time. Now she studied the underlying issue more deeply and wrote an article that reads a bit funny in the Google translation: Cases of children removed from families in the UK grew up with incentives to adopt.

Among the thousands of families who say they have unfairly lost the kids, in recent years, a few dozen arrived in Brussels. The European Parliament asked for an investigation to the European Commission.

The case of Pedros’ family, whose five children were removed in 2013 in Grantham, and the Portuguese mother in May this year was without the baby of five months in Southend-on-sea, are the most visible side of a situation which affects other Portuguese families living in the United Kingdom – will be at least five – and, in recent years tens of thousands of mainly British and foreign families.

The frequency and severity of cases is not now, but this year prompted a petition to the European Parliament with more than 3,600 signatures involving families who claim to be victims of unjust processes, completed, in some cases, with the irreversible adoption of children without their consent. Continue reading →

LINCOLN POLICE – arrests and child snatch of Portuguese family without Court Orders

21 Wednesday May 2014

Posted by Sabine Kurjo McNeill in EU Parliament, Imprisonment, Petitions Committee, Police Arrest, Search Warrant

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Carla, Jose, Lee Watkinson, Lincolnshire Police, McKenzie Friend, Pedro, Police officer, Portugal



Truth is stranger than fiction, once again. And even though I had heard about the Pedros’ experiences on 23 April 2013 before, they sank in with fresh power, as we visited Grantham Police Station – in preparation for Jose’s and Carla’s bail hearings today.

Here we picked up the forms RELEASED without CHARGE: “There is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.”20140521_111629

This time I am accompanied by Terence Steele who is not only a victim of the secret family court system himself but also an accomplished private investigator and active McKenzie Friend.

He had spent time with the Pedros before and approached their two firms of solicitors who had refused to return their documents to them. These include a vital video of the oldest son Emanuel making a statement about his supposed allegation of his father having hit him.  Continue reading →

EASTER SUNDAY in Grantham – after good news – before possible reunion in Portugal

21 Monday Apr 2014

Posted by Sabine Kurjo McNeill in EU Parliament, Imprisonment, Petitions Committee, Police Arrest, Search Warrant, The Telegraph

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Brussel, Grantham, Lincolnshire, Melissa Laird, Pedro, Portugal, Portuguese language, Slovak

20140325_150241The attache of the Embassy told the Pedros to ask me to continue helping them with their legal battles. And that after we were ordered to pay £2,000 for helping Melissa Laird voluntarily.

He managed to agree a ‘deal’ with Lincolnshire Council so that UK Social Services hand over the children to Portuguese authorities.

After nearly a year since the snatch on 23 April, this is a great success, compared with the Slovak boys who were only returned after 920 days in UK care and the involvement of the Slovak Government. More recently JOJ TV produced a new programme, as they were surprised that a year after their precedence, things had not improved in the UK.

To plan our next activities, I visited the Pedros in Grantham and let them tell their stories in Portuguese first. For after the first clip of SIC TV in Brussels, we had put high hopes on the program that RPT1 came to produce. But who would have believed that they gave her mother so much air time who was one of the reasons for leaving Portugal 11 years ago? The interviewer Rita Ramash never explained who gave her what kind of a brief and did not respond to my email.

Now we know once more why blogging needs to counteract ‘official’ messages and spin by Governments. But, hopefully, not everybody in the whole Government needs this kind of cover-up!


Continue reading →

THE PEDRO CHILDREN are going back to Portugal – thanks to Consulate and Embassy!

18 Friday Apr 2014

Posted by Sabine Kurjo McNeill in EU Parliament, Mainstream Media, Petitions Committee, Publico

≈ 23 Comments

Tags

Adoption, Brussel, Carla, European Parliament, John Hemming, Latvia, Noticias, Público (Portugal), Portugal, Portuguese language, Slovakia, Televisão Independente

After Slovakia, 14 04 18 Portuguese EmbassyPortuguese officials managed to stop a forced adoption and return the children to their home country!

The two youngest children will not be adopted and all of them will go back under the supervision of Portuguese authorities!

Carla was woken up with the good news by the phone call of TVI – one of the TV channels in Portugal: José Cesário –  Secretary of State of Portuguese Communities Abroad had asked the Embassy to make sure that the children come back asap.

These are the first articles publicising the excellent news:

  • in Publico
  • in Noticias ao Minuto
  • and in English: “Stolen-in-UK” children coming back to Portugal.

Latvia must be next!

That’s also what Against Child Trafficking are saying in the international context.

Related articles
  • EMIGRANT COUPLE in England without their 5 children – major article in major Portuguese paper – a day before Brussels
  • “CAN WE GO BACK HOME, please?” – the voice of the Pedro children in The Portugal News Online
  • FAMILY from Almeirim loses five children in England – published in Portugal – just before Brussels
  • WHAT HAPPENS to Children in England? Article in Portuguese Correio da Manha
  • MP John Hemming and Coventry MPs alert parliament
Enhanced by Zemanta

WHAT HAPPENS to Children in England? Article in Portuguese Correio da Manha

16 Wednesday Apr 2014

Posted by Sabine Kurjo McNeill in Correio da Manha, EU Parliament, Mainstream Media, Petitions Committee, Publico

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Child Abuse, Correio da Manha, Early day motion, England, European Parliament, John Hemming, Leah McGrath Goodman, Member of Parliament

14 04 07 CM JornalWHAT HAPPENS to Children in England? is an extensive article in a national newspaper about the Pedro family published on 07 April 2014.

It is based on interviewing veteran advisor Ian Josephs who has been helping families since 1961 and is publishing Forced Adoption.

It also quotes John Hemming, the only MP who advances the cause in Parliament. As Chairman of Justice for Families, he has over 2,000 cases on file.

In Parliament, he has tabled a number of Early Day Motions (EDMs) to gather support from other MPs. He has also tabled the Families and Justice Bill which did not pass Parliamentary procedures to get Royal Assent. Here are his EDMs in this Parliamentary period:

Regarding the Pedros’ issues of forced adoption of foreign nationals:

  • Petitions to the European Parliament
  • International Concerns about UK Law
  • Care proceedings affecting Foreign Nationals

Wider issues regarding the secrecy of family courts:  Continue reading →

PERSECUTED for petitioning against Forced Adoption in Brussels

04 Friday Apr 2014

Posted by Sabine Kurjo McNeill in EU Parliament, Petitions Committee

≈ 12 Comments

Tags

Brussels, European Parliament, Family court, Lincolnshire, Pedros, Police, Search Warrant, United States

The Americans say “any publicity is ok, just spell my name right.” This does not apply to the UK and certainly not to victims of secret family courts. The Pedros were the first to be persecuted for having travelled to Brussels on 19 March 2014. They were arrested on 21 March for 12 hours and the Search Warrant said that Police ought to look for evidence of the ‘Forced Adoption group’. The arrest resulted in:

  • Police confiscating telephones, computers and travel documents
  • Police indicating that it was Lincolnshire Social Services who had made the application for the Search Warrant – suspecting that the Pedros were conspiring to abduct their own children – a charge yet to be seen formulated on paper
  • for the Police refused Carla copies of the transcript
  • and the Court refused a copy of the application for the Search Warrant.

No wonder that ‘experts’ of the legal system confirm that ‘disclosure’ continues to be the most sensitive of all issues. An alternative to ‘disclosure’ is ‘exposure’:

  • thanks to BBC LOOK NORTH who said that 35 of 37 adoptions in Lincolnshire were forced, i.e. dispensing with the consent of the parents; see on this Facebook page for now.

However, since then,

  • Emyr Wyn Jones was punished by Carmarthenshire Council for having travelled abroad;
  • Terence Steele had his article completely mis-represented in his local paper in Sutton;
  • Bhupesh Patel is being punished by his son not being named according to his religious tradition but ‘the SS way’ – completely contrary to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and EU Convention on Human Rights.

Hence

  • John Hemming MP’s Early Day Motion Petitions to the European Parliament [do get your MP to sign it!]
  • and our press release UK VIOLATIONS of EU LAW and CHILD RIGHTS.
Related articles
  • LIFE AFTER BRUSSELS? For the Pedros in a Police Cell after TV exposure in Petitions Committee of EU Parliament
  • DEAR SIR JAMES: please return our children and make forced adoptions reversible!
  • DEAR MEPs: Please ensure Seven Action Points for Petitions Committee of EU Parliament
  • FAMILY from Almeirim loses five children in England – published in Portugal – just before Brussels
  • DEAR MEPs: Please ensure Seven Action Points for Petitions Committee of EU Parliament
  • DEAR SIR JAMES: please return our children and make forced adoptions reversible!
  • WHAT NEXT after our Pilgrimage to Brussels? Individual Petitions and Collective Cries for Help to the EU Commission!
  • FW: This ranks with that by Martin Luther King! – Norman Scarth
  • Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent – before EU Petitions Committee in Brussels

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

“CAN WE GO BACK HOME, please?” – the voice of the Pedro children in The Portugal News Online

28 Friday Mar 2014

Posted by Sabine Kurjo McNeill in EU Parliament, Judicial Mechanisms, Petitions Committee

≈ 6 Comments

Tags

Brussel, European Parliament, John Hemming MP, Member of the European Parliament, Pedro, Portugal, Television, What Next?

20140325_150239This is a well rounded article covering institutional dilemmas of responsibility and accountability between national, international and local representatives in The Portugal News Online.

Meanwhile, children are screaming to be heard, parents are punished without crime and ultimately even taking their lives, if not also of their children, in some cases…

John Hemming MP has now agreed with the Pedros’ local MP Nick Boles that he’ll lead the action. We couldn’t get better news!

Meanwhile I have put these summaries together for parents and supporters to take action:

  • Dear MEP, if you want to be re-elected, will you commit to our ‘pro child’ agenda?
  • Dear Sir James, please return our children and make adoptions reversible!
  • What Next? After our pilgrimage to Brussels.
Related articles

Continue reading →

← Older posts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,098 other followers

Follow if you like!

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

EU PARLIAMENT: Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent – Did you Sign?

Presented on 19 March 2014 in Brussels

Click on image to see video at EU Petitions Committee Live!

Recent Posts

  • Portuguese Government to analyse cases involving Portuguese children taken by British social services @CEOofHMCTS @MoJGovUK @UKHomeOffice
  • LOVE YOU MOM – #documentary on Portuguese TV about #ChildSnatching #ForcedAdoptions #SocialServices #ChildSnatchUK @UKHomeOffice @CabinetOfficeUK
  • PRAISE to a Lincoln County Councillor: 4 of the Pedro children to return?
  • THERE ARE NO PLANS to return the children to your care – Lincoln Council – Algarve Resident responds
  • THREE FORCED ADOPTION articles in the National Portuguese Newspaper Publico
  • PEDROS SUSPECT of abducting their children during contact sessions – after Police dropped charges!
  • LET’s ASK in Portuguese: why are children screaming to be heard in the UK?
  • POLICE DROP CHARGES against Portuguese Parents Fighting for the Return of their Children
  • LINCOLN POLICE – arrests and child snatch of Portuguese family without Court Orders
  • EASTER SUNDAY in Grantham – after good news – before possible reunion in Portugal
  • THE PEDRO CHILDREN are going back to Portugal – thanks to Consulate and Embassy!
  • WHAT HAPPENS to Children in England? Article in Portuguese Correio da Manha
  • PERSECUTED for petitioning against Forced Adoption in Brussels
  • “CAN WE GO BACK HOME, please?” – the voice of the Pedro children in The Portugal News Online
  • PORTUGUESE IMMIGRANTS caught up in UK ‘adoption scandal’ – in an English paper in Portugal

Pages

  • About
    • CHILDREN BACK for Christmas!
    • Summary
      • Forensic Analysis
  • ‘Social’ Services
  • Munby Reforms
    • Significant Judgments
    • Professional Media
    • Mainstream Media
    • Proposals for Reform
    • Online Petitions
  • Judges for ‘justice’?
    • Say it in Poetry
  • EU PETITION
  • MEDIA Coverage
  • Contact

Booker Articles

  • A terrible act of inhumanity that shows why justice must never be secret
  • Children Advertised like Pets for Sale
  • New family court guidelines won't improve a rotten system for children
  • Operate on this mother so that we can take her baby
  • Our 'child protection' system is an international scandal

Child Snatching aka State Kidnapping

  • Child Care Proceedings Exposed
  • Forced Adoption
  • Punishment without Crime
  • State Kidnapping
  • State Stealing Children

Family Court Victims

  • Carla and Jose Pedro – Lincoln Council
  • Kellie Cottam – Flintshire Council
  • Latvian Laila Brice vs Merton Council
  • Melissa Laird – deported for her son to be adopted
  • Nigerian Family Destroyed by Haringey Council

For your MEP

  • If you want to be re-elected, commit to 'Pro Child'!
  • Minutes of Petitions Committee Meeting on 19/03/14
  • Official Video of PETI Committee Meeting
  • Please Ensure Action Points of Petitions Committee
  • Six Minutes of Presenting Petition to STOP FORCED ADOPTIONS in UK

For Your MP

  • Barrister Flees Barnet Council
  • Care Proceedings Affecting Foreign Nationals
  • Children Placed in Foster Care – before House of Commons
  • International Concerns about UK Law
  • Petitions to the European Parliament

Munby Reforms

  • Baby J: Courts to adopt to realities of internet and Social Media
  • Controversial secret courts must be open to scrutiny says leading judge
  • Judge of the Week
  • New family court guidelines won't improve a rotten system for children
  • No-one should be jailed in secret says top judge

Petitions to Sign

  • Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent
  • Abolish Secrecy and Remove Gags
  • The Secrecy of the Family Courts should be lifted Now

Archives

Blog Stats

  • 23,899 visits since Nov 2013

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • The Pedro Family: five children snatched by Lincoln County Council - without paper work
    • Join 2,098 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Pedro Family: five children snatched by Lincoln County Council - without paper work
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...